posted on Monday, March 20, 2006
-
extracted from http://angrydr.blogspot.com/2006/03/comparative-advantage-2.html
--
Understanding that capitalism can be 'predatory' and that globalisation may not always be fair to all parties involved does not mean that one automatically has to reject capitalism and globalisation. This is a false dichotomy. As you have said, it is not the concept of globalisation that is wrong, but the way it is being practised. Globalisation can be more than just exploitation of a poorer nation's labour or resources, it can also be tempered with regard for the needs of other nations.We, as consumers, are not helpless victims in a grand scheme that is inexorable or irreversible. We make our voice heard every time we excercise our choice and vote with our wallet. We are not 'obliged' to go for the cheapest or fastest goods or services. We can pick the ones that come from a business where workers are treated fairly, or that which harms the planet less. We may spend more, or have to put up with less efficiency, but we have a choice.What I am advocating is an awareness that efficiency do not always equate to happiness, and that profit do not always equate to good
-
extracted from http://angrydr.blogspot.com/2006/03/comparative-advantage-2.html
--